Random Roulette Numbers
QUESTION: My wife and I like to play roulette together. Low stakes, just having a good time.
We amuse ourselves with number selection. We both like family birthdays. She's a history teacher and sometimes she picks historic dates. I once had a big win playing uniform numbers of the 1993 Toronto Blue Jays.
At a family birthday party, we told about our number method. My wife's dad said, "You know, that's borderline insane, both that you'd play roulette at all and that you'd choose numbers in such a random way." He seemed to think following trends on the board with recent numbers was the way to go.
I suggested that random methods of choosing numbers in a game where random numbers were winners wasn't any worse than any other method. He wasn't hearing it.
What say you?
ANSWER: I'm with you. The family birthday method is a favorite of mine. Baseball numbers? Sure, why not? My team wouldn't be the '93 Blue Jays, but I wouldn't be averse to numbers from my favorite teams -- Cubs, Bears. Blackhawks, Fighting Illini.
Such methods are no better and no worse than following trends from the number board, regardless of whether you're betting on supposedly hot numbers or avoiding those that seem to have come up too often lately.
Assuming the wheel is in balance and the dealer is on the ball, every number has an equal chance of being a winner on every spin. If No. 17 has come up twice in a row and three times in the last eight spins, the odds of it coming up on the next spin of a double-zero wheel remain 1 in 38.
Ask yourself, "Is there anything that would cause one number to come up more often than others?" A need to balance results doesn't do it. The wheel and ball don't know of any such need.
In the rare instances where one number consistently recurs more often than odds would suggest, there must be a physical cause. The wheel could be badly maintained with tracks worn into the wood, perhaps, or frets between numbers that are tighter or higher in some areas than in others.
Such things are rare. For the most part, a short-term hot streak is just that: short-term. Going forward, the odds of the number coming up again are the same as the odds on your wife's birthday or Joe Carter's No. 29.
QUESTION: How many royal flush cards do you need before you break up a pat straight? I was playing 8-5 Double Double Bonus Poker and was dealt Ace of spades, King of hearts, Queen of hearts, Jack of hearts and 10 of clubs.
My head said hold all five and take the 20 credits. My heart really wanted to keep the suited King-Queen-Jack and go for it.
ANSWER: Your head had it right. A two-card draw to a royal flush is too much of a long shot to break up a straight, even allowing for the possibilities of drawing a straight flush, flush, another straight, three of a kind, two pairs or a pair.
The average return on holding King-Queen-Jack of hearts is 7.12 coins per five wagered. That's nowhere close to the 20 for holding the straight.
If you'd had a fourth high heart, that would have been another matter. If the 10 of clubs had been in hearts, the average return on K-Q-J-10 would have been 97.23 coins. If the fourth heart had been the Ace instead, the average would have been 91.49 coins. Either makes breaking up the straight well worth the risk.
We amuse ourselves with number selection. We both like family birthdays. She's a history teacher and sometimes she picks historic dates. I once had a big win playing uniform numbers of the 1993 Toronto Blue Jays.
At a family birthday party, we told about our number method. My wife's dad said, "You know, that's borderline insane, both that you'd play roulette at all and that you'd choose numbers in such a random way." He seemed to think following trends on the board with recent numbers was the way to go.
I suggested that random methods of choosing numbers in a game where random numbers were winners wasn't any worse than any other method. He wasn't hearing it.
What say you?
ANSWER: I'm with you. The family birthday method is a favorite of mine. Baseball numbers? Sure, why not? My team wouldn't be the '93 Blue Jays, but I wouldn't be averse to numbers from my favorite teams -- Cubs, Bears. Blackhawks, Fighting Illini.
Such methods are no better and no worse than following trends from the number board, regardless of whether you're betting on supposedly hot numbers or avoiding those that seem to have come up too often lately.
Assuming the wheel is in balance and the dealer is on the ball, every number has an equal chance of being a winner on every spin. If No. 17 has come up twice in a row and three times in the last eight spins, the odds of it coming up on the next spin of a double-zero wheel remain 1 in 38.
Ask yourself, "Is there anything that would cause one number to come up more often than others?" A need to balance results doesn't do it. The wheel and ball don't know of any such need.
In the rare instances where one number consistently recurs more often than odds would suggest, there must be a physical cause. The wheel could be badly maintained with tracks worn into the wood, perhaps, or frets between numbers that are tighter or higher in some areas than in others.
Such things are rare. For the most part, a short-term hot streak is just that: short-term. Going forward, the odds of the number coming up again are the same as the odds on your wife's birthday or Joe Carter's No. 29.
QUESTION: How many royal flush cards do you need before you break up a pat straight? I was playing 8-5 Double Double Bonus Poker and was dealt Ace of spades, King of hearts, Queen of hearts, Jack of hearts and 10 of clubs.
My head said hold all five and take the 20 credits. My heart really wanted to keep the suited King-Queen-Jack and go for it.
ANSWER: Your head had it right. A two-card draw to a royal flush is too much of a long shot to break up a straight, even allowing for the possibilities of drawing a straight flush, flush, another straight, three of a kind, two pairs or a pair.
The average return on holding King-Queen-Jack of hearts is 7.12 coins per five wagered. That's nowhere close to the 20 for holding the straight.
If you'd had a fourth high heart, that would have been another matter. If the 10 of clubs had been in hearts, the average return on K-Q-J-10 would have been 97.23 coins. If the fourth heart had been the Ace instead, the average would have been 91.49 coins. Either makes breaking up the straight well worth the risk.
This article is provided by the Frank Scoblete Network. Melissa A. Kaplan is the network's managing editor. If you would like to use this article on your website, please contact Casino City Press, the exclusive web syndication outlet for the Frank Scoblete Network. To contact Frank, please e-mail him at fscobe@optonline.net.
Random Roulette Numbers
is republished from CasinoCityTimes.com.