Game Types Bonuses Slots More
Online Casinos Poker Bingo Games Lotteries Sports & Racebooks Fantasy Sports Forex Betting Exchanges Spread Betting Binary Options Live Dealers
Weekly Newsletter Online Gaming News Payment Methods Gaming Software Gaming Site Owners Gaming Jurisdictions Edit Preferences Search

Online Casino City Times

Top 10 Online Casinos

1. Bovada Casino
2. CoolCat Casino
3. Silver Oak Casino
4. BetOnline Casino
5. Solts of Vegas
6. Win A Day Casino
7. Slot Madness Casino
8. Always Cool Casino
9. Palace of Chance
10. Prism Casino

> back to current newsletter
Weekly Newsletter Sign Up
Don’t miss an issue! Have the newsletter sent directly to you.

Daily fantasy sports ruled gambling in New York

30 Oct 2018

By Dan Ippolito
Two years after a law was passed allowing regulated daily fantasy sports in New York, a judge ruled on Friday that these daily contests are a form of gambling and therefore violate the gambling ban in the state's constitution.

The ruling was made by Acting Supreme Court Justice Gerald Connolly.

“[Interactive fantasy sports] participants have no control whatsoever of the performance of the selected players, though the experience, research and related skill involved in selecting an IFS team can sharply impact an IFS participant’s chances of prevailing,” Connolly wrote. “As such, the first legislative finding proffered, that is, the rationale for why ‘IFS is not a game of chance,’ does not lead to the conclusion that there is not, to a material degree, an element of chance to IFS competition.”

Attorney David Boies, who represents DraftKings, claimed in a statement that the ruling allows DraftKings to "continue to offer their services to players." He said they're studying the "decision invalidating the regulatory structure and are committed to working with the legislature."

DraftKings and FanDuel are being allowed to continue their services because they are based on players' skills. Both have been active in New York since the 2016 law was signed and passed.

Connolly's ruling is subject to appeal, but it is not clear whether the Gaming Commission plans on doing so.
 
About Us | Advertising | Publications | Land Casinos