Game Types
Online Casinos Poker Bingo Games Lotteries Sports & Racebooks Fantasy Sports Forex Betting Exchanges Spread Betting Binary Options Live Dealers
Weekly Newsletter Online Gaming News Payment Methods Gaming Software Gaming Site Owners Gaming Jurisdictions Edit Preferences Search
Bonuses! New games! Gossip! And all the player news you can handle. Sign up NOW!

John Grochowski

John  Grochowski
John Grochowski is the best-selling author of The Craps Answer Book, The Slot Machine Answer Book and The Video Poker Answer Book. His weekly column is syndicated to newspapers and Web sites, and he contributes to many of the major magazines and newspapers in the gaming field. Listen to John Grochowski's "Casino Answer Man" tips Tuesday through Friday at 5:18 p.m. on WLS-AM (890) in Chicago.

More about John Grochowski
More articles by John Grochowski

John Grochowski's Website:

Books by John Grochowski:
More books by John Grochowski

Tough video poker decision

4 Nov 2018

By John Grochowski
In early October I found myself at a 9/6 Double Double Bonus poker machine, with a man and woman occupying the two games to my right.

He seemed to be the more experienced player, and he was giving advice on how to play her hands. It was loud enough that I couldn't ignore it, though I avoid giving my own two cents in such situations.

When she had two pairs, jacks on top of 9s, he told her to keep the Jacks and toss the 9s.

"The worst you can do is finish with the pair of jacks," he said. "That pays the same as two pair. You need to give yourself a shot at drawing something big, like four of a kind."

That's a mistake players have been making ever since games paying 1-for-1 on two pairs were introduced in the early 1990s. The early games Jacks or Better and Bonus Poker paid 2-for-1, making holding two pairs a no-brainer compared to holding just a high pair, with a 1-for-1 return.

But Double Bonus, Bonus Poker Deluxe and later Double Double Bonus and others muddied the waters. They pay the same on two pairs as on single pairs of Jacks or Better.

If you hold both pairs, the best you can do on the draw is to fill out a full house, paying 9-for-1 on 9/6 DDB. But if you hold a high pair and draw three cards, you could improve to three of a kind, a full house or four of a kind.

Problem is, the chances of filling in a full house with a two-pair start are a lot better than completing four of a kind when starting with a pair.

Let's analyze using the actual hand witnessed, with two jacks, two 9s and a 7. If you hold both pairs and discard the 7, there are 47 possible one-card draws. Four of them — either of the other two jacks and either of the other 9s — will complete a full house. The other available 43 cards leave you with two pairs.

Assuming a five-coin bet, you get a 45-coin return on the 8.5% of hands improved by the draw, and a five-coin return that gets your bet back on those that leave you with two pairs. Your average return is 8.40 coins for a five-coin bet.

If you hold the jacks and discard the other three, there are 16,215 possible draws. You'll wind up with a high pair on 11,520 hands. You'll get back to two pairs on 2,269 hands, so on 13,789 hands, you settle for that money-back return.

The most frequent upgrade is to three of a kind, with 1,852 possible draws for a 15-coin pay, followed by 169 full houses for 45 coins each and 45 four of a kinds for 250 apiece.

You'll complete four of a kind on only 0.28% of draws, and that's the only draw when starting with a pair that's better than your possible full houses when starting with two pairs.

Your average return for holding the high pair and discarding three cards is 7.24 coins per five wagered. That's not a close call. It's a far better play to hold both pairs.

The exception, of course, is if you have aces as your high pair. Then the 800-coin return on four aces plus the outside shot at a 2,000-coin bonanza for four aces with a low kicker makes holding the aces alone a better play than holding two pairs.

But with jacks, queens or kings, don't underestimate the value of two pairs, or overestimate your chance of improving a single pair.

Look for John Grochowski on Facebook ( and Twitter (@GrochowskiJ).

This article is provided by the Frank Scoblete Network. Melissa A. Kaplan is the network's managing editor. If you would like to use this article on your website, please contact Casino City Press, the exclusive web syndication outlet for the Frank Scoblete Network. To contact Frank, please e-mail him at

About Us | Advertising | Publications | Land Casinos